BIOECOLOGIA DO ACARÁ-BANDEIRA Pterophyllum scalare (SCHULTZE IN LICHTENSTEIN, 1823)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present work is to present the bioecological characteristics of the angelfish Pterophyllum scalare (Schultze in Lichtenstein, 1823) from a bibliographic review carried out through the search portals in CAPES Periodicals, Google Scholar, Scielo and ScienceDirect, using the scientific and common names of the species as keywords. After the selection and reading of the articles, the taxonomy, biology, ecology, fisheries and conservation status of the species were characterized. The angelfish is a freshwater fish from the Amazon basin that has great commercial importance, acquired mainly due to its exuberance (morphology and color) and for adapting very well to other species. It is an omnivorous fish, which inhabits bentho-pelagic environments, being easily found in rivers and streams with a high density of vegetation. It has a small size, reaching up to 15 cm in standard length. It presents several varieties of coloration commercialized in Brazil and in the world. It is a species that is not at risk of extinction, and its fishing and trade is permitted in accordance with current legislation. The angelfish is widely studied, but there is a gap regarding aspects of fishing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".