Age-Critical and Secure Blockchain Sharding Scheme for Satellite-Based Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is witnessed that blockchain technology has been widely studied in Internet of Things (IoT) applications due to its decentralized tamper-resistance. Meanwhile, satellite-based IoT (S-IoT) becomes popular and has been regarded as a potential solution of the scalability due to its ubiquitous coverage inherited from satellites. Nevertheless, the large-scale blockchain network enabled S-IoT (BNS-IoT) would be limited by timely performing consensus. In this paper, we propose an age-critical blockchain sharding (ABS) scheme with the metric of information timeliness, i.e., age of information (AoI) to realize timely consensus in BNS-IoT. Specifically, we propose a forking-waiting-retransmission (FR) mechanism for the ABS scheme to deal with forking events, and realize a secure consensus. Then, we derive the closed-form expressions of average AoI (AAoI), throughput and security performance of the FR mechanism in ABS scheme, respectively, and compare with the$n$-block confirmation and select the longest-chain ($n$-LC) mechanism. Simulation results show that our ABS scheme can realize the linear expansion of throughput with the increasing number of shards, and our FR mechanism can greatly improve the security by sacrificing minor AAoI compared with the$n$-LC mechanism. Furthermore, our ABS scheme can outperform the conventional random sharding (RS) scheme in terms of AAoI and throughout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".