Intelligent Virtual Resource Allocation of QoS-Guaranteed Slices in B5G-Enabled VANETs for Intelligent Transportation Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5G communication technologies and networks help researchers and engineers look into intelligent transportation systems (ITS) with a new eye, including vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) application. Network function virtualization (NFV) and network slicing (NS) are accepted as two most promising technologies towards the agile and elastic network architecture of 5G and beyond 5G (B5G). However, previous researchers studied NFV and NS separately. In addition, learning technologies, such as reinforcement leaning (RL), graph-based learning, emerge so as to enhance the network intelligence and resource allocation in recent years. Inspired from these, we jointly explore intelligent resource allocation issue within B5G-enabled VANETs. At first, the novel virtual resource allocation framework supporting NFV and NS for providing quality of service (QoS)-guaranteed slices is constructed. Then, we formulate the virtual resource allocation of slices as the optimization problem, having the goals of providing guaranteed QoS performance and maximizing the net profit. Considering the non convex attributes of the formulated optimization problem, we propose one intelligent and feasible algorithm instead, including the details of the proposed intelligent algorithm. We record the results in order to validate the feasibility and highlights of our proposed algorithm. For example, our intelligent algorithm has the slice acceptance advantage of 5%, comparing with the best existing work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".