MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285286335 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2022.1.002

A hybrid matheuristic approach for the vehicle routing problem with three-dimensional loading constraints

2022· article· en· W4285286335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVehicle routing problemColumn generationMathematical optimizationGRASPBenchmark (surveying)Set (abstract data type)Bin packing problemHeuristicComputer scienceGreedy algorithmPacking problemsGreedy randomized adaptive search procedureHeuristicsSet packingPath (computing)ConstructiveContainer (type theory)Routing (electronic design automation)MathematicsAlgorithmProcess (computing)BinEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a matheuristic algorithm based on a column generation structure for the capacitated vehicle routing problem with three-dimensional loading constraints (3L–CVRP). In the column generation approach, the master problem is responsible for managing the selection of best-set routes. In contrast, the slave problem is responsible for solving a shorter restricted route problem (CSP, Constrained Shortest Path) for generating columns (feasible routes). The CSP is not necessarily solved to optimality. In addition, a greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) algorithm is used to verify the packing constraints. The master problem begins with a set of feasible routes obtained through a multi-start randomized constructive algorithm (MSRCA) heuristic for the multi-container loading problem (3D–BPP, three-dimensional bin packing problem). The MSRCA consists of finding valid routes considering the customers' best packing (packing first-route second). The efficiency of the proposed approach has been validated by a set of benchmark instances from the literature. The results show the efficiency of the proposed approach and conclude that the slave problem is too complex and computationally expensive to solve through a MIP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it