MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285291891 · doi:10.1525/gfc.2022.22.2.100

Review: <i>Porkopolis: American Animality, Standardized Life, &amp; the Factory Farm</i>, by Alex Blanchette

2022· article· en· W4285291891 on OpenAlexaffabout
Josée Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueGastronomica The Journal of Food and Culture · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationFactory (object-oriented programming)FolklifeDownloadLibrary scienceArt historyHistoryArtComputer scienceWorld Wide WebLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| May 01 2022 Review: Porkopolis: American Animality, Standardized Life, & the Factory Farm, by Alex Blanchette Porkopolis: American Animality, Standardized Life, & the Factory Farm, Alex Blanchette, Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2020 320 pp. Illustrations. $104.95 (hardcover); $27.95 (paper); (eBook) Josée Johnston Josée Johnston University of Toronto Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Gastronomica (2022) 22 (2): 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.2.100 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Guest Access Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Josée Johnston; Review: Porkopolis: American Animality, Standardized Life, & the Factory Farm, by Alex Blanchette. Gastronomica 1 May 2022; 22 (2): 100–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.2.100 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentGastronomica Search What is the real story behind supermarket bacon and pork chops? How much do we know about the people who labor to bring meaty meals to our plates? Even if we swear off eating meat, are we still implicated in a system of factory farming? Building on a two-year ethnography of the industrial pig set in a rural American community, Alex Blanchette seeks to answer these questions in his book, Porkopolis. Porkopolis has its share of muckraking details. Blanchette carefully researched the pigs and people in a town he calls “Dixon,” centered on “Dover Foods”—an agribusiness firm that kills 5.6 million hogs annually. This translates into one pig killed every 3 seconds, 2.8 million pounds of meat shipped transnationally, and 5.5 million pounds of biological matter moving through the Dover system daily. Readers learn that breeding sows “never see daylight except through tiny windows on the barn’s periphery” (p. 95),... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastronomica The Journal of Food and CultureSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207