MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285306720 · doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2022.3.008

The effect of service innovation, corporate image, human capital strategy and customer loyalty on performance: Evidence from rice industry

2022· article· en· W4285306720 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chutikarn Sriviboon

Bibliographic record

VenueUncertain Supply Chain Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOrganizational and Employee Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyalty business modelBusinessHuman capitalStructural equation modelingMarketingService (business)Sample (material)LoyaltyPositive relationshipIndustrial organizationService qualityEconomicsPsychologyComputer scienceEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study purpose is to investigate the effect of service innovation, corporate image, and human capital strategy and customer loyalty on performance for small and micro community enterprise of rice products in central northeast Thailand. For this objective, researchers applied the quantitative research approach and used the cross sectional research design. To obtain data, the researchers distributed questionnaires directly and online to respondents which were small and micro community enterprise of rice products in central northeast Thailand for 1 month from the beginning of September and obtained valid answers totaling 320 responses, which then we chose to be the sample in this study. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) results show that corporate image had a positive and significant relationship with the human capital strategy. In the same vein, the customer loyalty had also a positive and significant relationship with the humane capital strategy. Further findings show that service innovation had also a positive and significant relationship with the human capital strategy. Moreover, service innovation, corporate image, customer loyalty had also a positive and significant relationship with the business performance. On the other hand, human capital strategy had also a positive and significant relationship with the business performance. Based on these findings, the current study could provide researchers and policy makers to know about the importance of all predictors to increase their business performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUncertain Supply Chain ManagementSame topicOrganizational and Employee PerformanceFrench-language works237,207