PROMOCIÓN DE TRANSICIONES DE ROL EXITOSAS DE ENFERMERO A ENFERMERO DE PRÁCTICA AVANZADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En todo el mundo, Enfermeros de Prctica Avanzada (EPAs) brindan una amplia gama de servicios de atencin directa a personas en todas las etapas de la vida 1 . Adems de tratar enfermedades, ensean a las personas y a sus familias sobre cmo llevar una vida sana, prevenir y controlar enfermedades 2 . En la mayora de los pases, este profesional esencial de la salud pasa por varias etapas a lo largo de su proceso educativo para convertirse en un Enfermero de Prctica Avanzada (EPA). En general, el sujeto es un enfermero que ha realizado prcticas intensivas y ha desarrollado una experiencia clnica considerable antes de inscribirse en cursos de posgrado y prctica avanzada. Sin embargo, la transicin de enfermero a EPA puede resultar difcil, y aquellos que eligen ejercer este nuevo rol enfrentan muchos desafos. Adems, se advierte un cambio cognitivo significativo al pasar de enfermero experimentado a EPA sin experiencia. Este ajuste en la identidad profesional de un enfermero "experto" a un EPA "novato" puede potencialmente disminuir la autoconfianza, impedir el desarrollo del rol profesional e influir de manera negativa en la determinacin de los nuevos enfermeros de permanecer en la profesin durante su primer ao de prctica clnica 3 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".