Perfil nutricional de crianças menores de dois anos, informações sociodemográficas e estado nutricional da mãe, no município de Palmas (TO)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The assessment of the nutritional status of children is important for monitoring the quality of life and child development, besides predicting the living conditions of the general population. The aim of this study is to evaluate the nutritional profile and associated factors in children under two years of age living in the city of Palmas (TO). This is research of a quantitative nature, of a transversal nature, operating in the descriptive classification, through a survey/survey in which it uses statistical techniques, and a research instrument (questionnaire) containing questions related to sociodemographic variables. The sample studied consisted of 109 children under two years of age in the municipality, and it was possible to evaluate the nutritional status at birth of 87 (79.80%) and current of 52 (47.70%) children. Eutrophy was the most frequent nutritional status at birth and current in the children studied. Overweight was the main anthropometric deviation/nutritional status observed in children younger than two years in the municipality. There was no significant association between the nutritional status at birth and present infant with the maternal nutritional status, and it was possible to observe a greater association with the sociodemographic characteristics. Keywords: Nutritional status. Child. Child development. Weight at birth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it