MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285317087 · doi:10.33751/palar.v7i2.4503

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM AKTA NOTARIS DALAM RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM (RUPS) MELALUI TELEKONFERENSI

2021· article· id· W4285317087 on OpenAlexaff
Octavianna Evangelistas, Daly Erny

Bibliographic record

VenuePALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
FundersUniversitas Indonesia
KeywordsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakRapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) telekonferensi merupakan proses pertemuan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dengan meggunakan media elektronik dimana Notaris dapat hadir di dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham untuk membuatkan akta terkait keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham. Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham telekonferensi tetap sah dengan elektronik apabila dilaksanakan dengan memperhatikan ketentuan undang-undang. Namun yang menjadi kendala ialah tidak dimungkinkannya seorang Notaris melakukan kegiatannya dalam membuat akta melalui telekonferensi maupun media elektronik lainnya melainkan harus bertemu secara langsung. Tujuan penulisan ini diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan masukan bagi pihak-pihak terkait tentang Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Melalui Telekonferensi agar pelaksanaan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham melalui telekonferensi ini dapat terlaksana guna memudahkan para pihak dalam melakukan kegiatan bisnis. Adapun metode yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Peraturan-peraturan di Indonesia khususnya Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris sepatutnya dapat mengakomodir dan memberikan ruang agar Notaris dapat membuatkan aktanya dengan tidak bertatap muka secara langsung melainkan menggunakan telekonferensi. Kata kunci: akta relaas, rapat umum pemegang saham, telekonferensi AbstrakThe teleconference of General Meeting of Stakeholders is a meeting process that uses an electronic media which Notary will attend the meeting to make a deed for its resolution. The teleconference of General Meeting of Stakeholders remains valid if exercised in accordance with the regulations. However, there is still an issue for the Notary in exercising his duty for making a deed that it should be on the “traditional way” where the Notary and all the parties are meet offline. The purpose of this writing is expected to be input for related parties regarding the Legal Standing of the Notary Deed in the General Meeting of Stakeholders via Teleconference so that the implementation of the General Meeting of Stakeholders via this teleconference can be carried out to facilitate the parties in conducting business activities. The method used is a normative juridical research method. The regulations in Indonesia, especially the Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary, should be able to accommodate and to provide a space so that the Notary would be able to make his deed by not meeting face to face but using a teleconference. Keywords: deed, GMOS general meeting of stakeholders, teleconference

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEWSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207