MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Developing a Simple Lumped Parameter-based State Estimator for PneuNets

2021· article· en· W4285324802 on OpenAlexaff
P. D. S. H. Gunawardane, A. P. T. D. Pathirana, Nimali T. Medagedara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersOpen University
KeywordsEstimatorStiffnessFinite element methodControl theory (sociology)SineActuatorRoot mean squareComputer scienceMean squared errorMathematicsAlgorithmControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Structural engineeringGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft actuators (SAs) are used for gripping and manipulating activities in various industrial applications and different designs of SAs are developed to improve their efficacy. In these designs, compliance materials are used to control the morphology of SAs to generate different movements. Specifically, PneuNets design is one of the popular designs and it uses the pressure difference in their internally networked chambers to control the movements. These chambers act as energy storing and releasing elements during pressurizing and de-pressurizing stages and play an important role in controlling motion output. These discrete chambers are usually networked and continuum therefore, they are difficult to model and integrate into control systems. The present paper attempts to use a hypothetical disc model to estimate the real-time states of PneuNets. The proposed second-order model has a single stiffness element (K) and a single damping element (B) that is assumed to be approximately equal to the change of bending angle of the PneuNet. These K and B values are obtained experimentally and the results were compared against finite element simulations. The model was tested for step/sine inputs and resulted in an average root-mean-square-error approximately 4%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207