MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285328891 · doi:10.37897/rjid.2021.s.4

Varicella-zoster virus infection and pregnancy

2021· article· en· W4285328891 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruxandra-Patricia Nitica, Brîndușa Ana Cimpoca-Raptis, Nicolae Gică, Mihaela Demetrian, Anca Marina Ciobanu, Radu Botezatu, Corina Gică, Gheorghe Peltecu, Anca Maria Panaitescu

Bibliographic record

VenueRomanian Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyChickenpoxPopulationVaccinationTransmission (telecommunications)PediatricsVirusImmunologyObstetricsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Varicella-zoster virus is a herpes virus that causes mild to moderate disease when primary infection (chickenpox) is acquired in childhood, but leading to great morbidity and mortality in adults, with even more complications in pregnant women. As a physiologic adaptation in pregnancy that diminishes the possibility of fetal rejection, the altered maternal immune system is the reason why complications are more frequent in this segment of adult population. Moreover, a great concern is represented by the risk of vertical transmission to the fetus that can lead to congenital varicella syndrome (CVS) in the first 2 trimesters or to neonatal varicella if the mother develops the illness perinatally. Antiviral treatment reduces the gravity of the clinical manifestations, but the existent data shows that it doesn’t influence the rate of fetal transmission. Immunoglobulin anti-VZV (VZIG) can be given as prophylaxis when there has been described contact with the virus. Vaccination should be offered to all non-immunized women at the prenatal visit to diminish the maternal and fetal risks in case of subsequent exposure. The purpose of this review is to update the current understanding regarding the best management of varicella infection in pregnancy, based on the latest data from literature and guidelines. An electronic research for relevant reviews and articles published in the last 5 years was made, using PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Data Base, and also the current international guidelines promoted by the Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies in Canada, United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. The importance of prenatal detection of non-immunized women by serologic testing for varicella antibodies should not be overlooked, and subsequent vaccination should be advised to lower the significant complications associated with developing the disease in pregnancy. In case of varicella infection in pregnancy, adequate treatment should be immediately initiated with immunoglobulin and antivirals. Careful follow-up with serial fetal echography should assess if there are abnormalities of fetal development consistent with congenital varicella syndrome. Future mothers need to be advised about the probability of vertical transmission and the associated fetal malformations. Future consideration must focus on identifying the woman at childbearing age at risk and facilitate the vaccination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRomanian Journal of Infectious Diseases→Same topicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→