MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

«Both Dead and Alive…»: Prophetic Ideas of Taras Shevchenko In Antin Rudnytsky's channel «Poslanie»

2021· article· en· W4285344357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alina Varshavska

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian musicology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianDiasporaEmigrationHistoryPublic figureSymphonyGraduation (instrument)HomelandClassicsAncient historyPolitical scienceLawArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ukrainian emigration culture is an exciting and understudied page of diaspora research. Almost three decades after a long life, the names of its prominent figures are actively returning to the history of our culture, in particular Antina Rudnytsky - the primary representative of the urban elite of the American diaspora. The life-giving work of washing covered the period three-quarters of the twentieth century. He was a talented composer, pianist, conductor, music, and public figure who lived half of his life in USA (1937-1975). Still, He remained a conscious Ukrainian, a patriot who, even in exile, carried out activities related to Ukraine, its history, and modernity. In the 1950s and 1960s, the composer redoubled his decision to develop the Ukrainian diaspora's public life actively. In 1957, Antin Rudnytsky willingly responded to the request of the community and the Taras Shevchenko Scientific Society to write a symphonic cantata on the words of the immortal Shevchenko's Message ("To both the dead and the living ...") on the centenary of Taras Shevchenko's death. The cantata "Poslanie" played an essential role in uniting the Ukrainian national forces in the United States and Europe, Australia, and Canada. This proved that the state of Ukraine and faith in them would never fade in the hearts and souls of the Ukrainian people, both in the diaspora and in mainland Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUkrainian musicologySame topicEuropean Politics and SecurityFrench-language works237,207