MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285358295 · doi:10.15421/392196

WAGES AND MECHANISM OF ITS PAYMENTS IN UKRAINE AND CANADA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2021· article· en· W4285358295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueActual problems of native jurisprudence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor Market and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemunerationSalaryWageConstitutionLegislationIncentivePaymentLabour economicsEconomicsPiece workWork (physics)Political scienceLawMarket economyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines and compares the concept and size of wages in Ukraine and Canada. In the course of the research the definition of the term’s “salary” and “wage” according to the labor legislation of Ukraine and Canada was considered. The analysis and comparison of the definition of the concept of wages contained in the regulations governing labor relations in Ukraine and Canada. The author's own vision of the definition of "salary" is given. It is proved that wages and remuneration are essentially different concepts between which it is inappropriate to equate, because wages should be paid to the employee for the work performed by him, that is, in essence, it should be compensatory, and remuneration is just an incentive or compensatory nature, for example, the reward should be considered gratitude for conscientious work or outstanding achievements in professional activities, etc. It is concluded that at the constitutional level the right of a person to remuneration and related opportunities are more specifically and in detail specified in the Constitution of Ukraine in comparison with the Constitution of Canada where it is reduced to a minimum. An analysis of the level of wages in Ukraine and Canada, based on the size of wages, different professions and areas of activity. It is concluded that wages play an important role between the subjects of labor relations in both Ukraine and Canada. It is noted that there is a huge gap between the salaries of workers in Ukraine and Canada. Attention is paid to the comparison of the minimum wage in Ukraine and Canada. It is noted that it is positive to borrow from the experience of Canada forms of remuneration, this would eliminate the shortcoming of the current The Labor Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine "On Remuneration of Labor" in terms of consolidating forms of remuneration. The approach to the procedure for payment of wages at the state level in Ukraine and Canada is analyzed, it is concluded that the content of the rules governing the mechanism of payment of wages in Canada are similar to those contained in the Labor Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine "On Remuneration of Labor", But there are some differences that are positive in nature and bring some flexibility in the regulation of labor relations regarding the legal regulation of wages, which can be borrowed and used in the labor legislation of Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it