MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285358633 · doi:10.21742/ijiphm.2021.8.1.02

Emotion Recognition using Facial Expression

2021· article· en· W4285358633 on OpenAlexaff
Jay Naimesh Patel, Jinan Fiaidhi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of IT-based Public Health Management · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial expressionFacial expression recognitionAndroid (operating system)Python (programming language)MoodComputer scienceEmotion recognitionStudioWorld Wide WebAffective computingEmotion detectionHuman–computer interactionMultimediaPsychologyArtificial intelligenceFacial recognition systemSocial psychologyPattern recognition (psychology)Programming languageOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, research has shown an increased development of social networking applications.Social networking applications are recently getting wider interest among people of different ages.But due to irrelevant posts, the mood of a user can get affected.The project "Emotion Recognition Using Facial Expression" is based on a new concept where a person can filter friends' posts by emotions.The emotion would be detected from a facial expression.Using this application, a sad person's mood can be elevated as sad posts will be filtered out (as only happy posts will be seen).To develop the mobile application of this project, Android Studio was used.Python and TensorFlow were used to train the model.For data storage purposes, Firebase was used as it is compatible with any other platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of IT-based Public Health ManagementSame topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207