Diagnosis of colonic dysmotility associated with autonomic dysfunction in patients with chronic refractory constipation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the first study assessing human colon manometric features and their correlations with changes in autonomic functioning in patients with refractory chronic constipation prior to consideration of surgical intervention. High-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM) with simultaneous heart rate variability (HRV) was performed in 14 patients, and the resulting features were compared to healthy subjects. Patients were categorized into three groups that had normal, weak, or no high amplitude propagating pressure waves (HAPWs) to any intervention. We found mild vagal pathway impairment presented as lower HAPW amplitude in the proximal colon in response to proximal colon balloon distention. Left colon dysmotility was observed in 71% of patients, with features of (1) less left colon HAPWs, (2) lower left colon HAPW amplitudes (69.8 vs 102.3 mmHg), (3) impaired coloanal coordination, (4) left colon hypertonicity in patients with coccyx injury. Patients showed the following autonomic dysfunction: (1) high sympathetic tone at baseline, (2) high sympathetic reactivity to active standing and meal, (3) correlation of low parasympathetic reactivity to the meal with absence of the coloanal reflex, (4) lower parasympathetic and higher sympathetic activity during occurrence of HAPWs. In conclusion, left colon dysmotility and high sympathetic tone and reactivity, more so than vagal pathway impairment, play important roles in refractory chronic constipation and suggests sacral neuromodulation as a possible treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".