MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285393211 · doi:10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y

Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers

2022· erratum· en· W4285393211 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle B. Rice, Ba’ Pham, Justin Presseau, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Integrity and Peer Review · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversitySt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of OttawaOttawa Public HealthUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityInstitute for Work & HealthOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMega-Computer sciencePeer reviewInformation retrievalLibrary sciencePolitical sciencePhysicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

reviews were male (92%) as compared to the control reviewers (70% male)' , instead of 74% vs 58% as listed in the table.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaMetaresearch
Domain: Evaluation · Genre: Editorial
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptMetaresearch
Domain: Evaluation · Genre: Editorial
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.266
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.266
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.368
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Integrity and Peer ReviewSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchCategoryMetaresearchFrench-language works237,207