MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285398267 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-01251218mtgabs

Modelling Investigation of the Impact of Several Process Parameters on the Growth of the Viscous Layer during the Electropolishing

2022· article· en· W4285398267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectropolishingPolishingElectrolyteInconelMaterials scienceLayer (electronics)DissolutionOxideMechanicsWork (physics)AnodeLiquid metalMetallurgyChemical physicsThermodynamicsComposite materialChemistryElectrodePhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemical polishing (EP) is of great interest because it is able to deal with small parts exhibiting high complex shapes and/or material hard to be polished. Electropolishing is an electrolytic process based on the anodic dissolution of the workpiece under constant current or potential. Previous work done on stainless steel 316L shows the ability of the process to obtain smooth and bright surfaces [1]. The mechanisms describing EP are not yet fully understood, but several mechanisms can be taken into account for its description and prediction. Jacquet’s theory is based on the influence of an electric resistance gradient [2]. Elmore will then complete it with the gradient of concentration in metal cation [3,4]. Diard and al proposed the role of so called “acceptor” species [5]. While Hoar and Mowat’s work are based on the formation of an oxide layer on the surface [6]. All theories have in common the establishment of a viscous layer (solid or liquid) that governs the process. On this basis, it is possible to propose a numerical approach for the simulation of the viscous layer formation during electropolishing of stainless steel 316L and Inconel parts. The objective is to demonstrate the impact of various process parameters (electrochemical parameters, electrolyte nature and concentration as well as hydrodynamic conditions) on the growth and the stability of this layer. The figure illustrate the simulation of the viscous layer growth during the electropolishing of a plate at the bottom taking into account the circulation of the electrolyte from the left to the right. [1] C. Rotty, A. Mandroyan, M-L Doche, J-Y Hihn, Surface & Coatings Technology vol.307 p125–135 (2016). [2] JACQUET, P.A., Electrolytic method for obtaining bright copper surfaces, Nature 135 (1935) 1076. [3] ELMORE, W.C., Electrolytic Polishing, J. Appl. Phys. 10 (1939) 724–727, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1707257 . [4] ELMORE, W.C., Electrolytic Polishing II, J. Appl. Phys. 11 (1940) 797–799, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1712738 . [5] DIARD, J.P., LANDAUD, P., LE CANUT, J.-M., LE GORREC, B., Interprétation cinétique du palier de polissage électrochimique des métaux, 6ème forum sur les impédances électrochimiques, Montrouge, 1992. [6] HOAR, T.P., MOWAT, J.A.S., Mechanism of electropolishing, Nature 165 (1950) 64–65. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it