MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285398951 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-01552316mtgabs

Ethanol and Methanol Electrolysis at Core-Shell Ru@Pt and PtRu@Pt Catalysts with Different Pt Shell-Thickness

2022· article· en· W4285398951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed Hashem Ali, Peter G. Pickup

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellCatalysisElectrolysisCyclic voltammetryPlatinumMethanolThermogravimetric analysisRutheniumInorganic chemistryDirect-ethanol fuel cellNanoparticleChemistryElectrolysis of waterElectrochemistryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceElectrocatalystLinear sweep voltammetryElectrodeNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the attractive methods used to prepare hydrogen gas is the electrolysis of alcohols such as methanol and ethanol in a proton exchange membrane (PEM) cell. Platinum is the most common catalyst used to provide high selectivity for C-C bond cleavage for ethanol, leading to an increase in the amount of hydrogen gas produced. However, the cost of the Pt and poisoning of the surface by the adsorbed CO intermediate limit its use. Combining Pt with other metals such as ruthenium in the form of core-shell nanoparticles enhances its ability for alcohol oxidation [1,2]. Therefore, more hydrogen gas is evolved in a PEM electrolysis cell, especially at lower applied potentials. In addition, these modified catalysts can be used in the anodes of direct alcohol fuel cells. Here, we aimed to prepare Pt-based core-shell nanoparticles in which commercial catalysts PtRu and Ru were used as the core, and different amounts of Pt were deposited on their surface as a shell (PtRu@Pt and Ru@Pt). These catalysts were prepared using the polyol method without adding any stabilizer that would block their surface and affected their alcohol oxidation activity. The formation of these core-shell nanoparticle catalysts was confirmed by using thermogravimetric analysis, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with an energy dispersive X-ray analyzer, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Moreover, the effect of the Pt thickness on methanol and ethanol electrochemical oxidation was studied using cyclic voltammetry at room temperature and a PEM electrolysis cell at 80 °C. Results show that methanol and ethanol oxidation activity increased greatly as the thickness of the Pt shell was increased, although the half potential was shifted to a higher potential. Moreover, the addition of the Pt to the shell increased the limiting current, indicating that the selectivity toward CO2 formation increased and that more hydrogen was being produced. Finally, Ru as a core showed a lower improvement for methanol oxidation than PtRu. However, Ru@Pt catalysts with more than one Pt monolayers gave higher ethanol oxidation performances than the PtRu@Pt catalysts. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Memorial University. References: T. M. Brueckner, E. Wheeler, B. Chen, E. N. El Sawy and P. G. Pickup, J. Electrochem. Soc., 166, F942 (2019). E. El Sawy, T. M. Brueckner and P. G. Pickup, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 106507 (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207