MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285399776 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-013493mtgabs

Carbon Paper Electrodes Modified with Bismuth for Enhancing the Performance of Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

2022· article· en· W4285399776 on OpenAlexaff
Maedeh Pahlevaninezhad, Damilola Momodu, Majid Pahlevani, Edward P.L. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEnergy storageFlow batteryBismuthRedoxElectrolyteNanotechnologyElectrodeChemistryPower (physics)MetallurgyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are a promising technology for grid scale stationary energy storage to complement renewable energy systems. Although RFBs have a relatively low energy density, they offer important benefits such as long lifetime, decoupled energy and power, high round-trip efficiency, scalability and design flexibility, fast response and low environmental impacts. These benefits make them superior to many other stationary energy storage technologies [1-3]. The vanadium RFB (VRFB) is the most widely used RFB in industry for grid scale energy storage and for integration of renewable energy generation systems [4]. However, due to their slow redox reaction rates, their performance and stability are limited and VRFBs would thus benefit from enhancement of the electrode kinetics [5]. Various catalysts have been employed to improve the redox reaction rates [5-6]. Bismuth is considered a suitable candidate due to its good reactivity with oxygen, low toxicity, relatively low cost and comparable catalytic properties to other metal competitors [5, 7-8]. In this study, we present a novel modified VRFB electrode composed of carbonized bismuth-polyaniline (Bi-PANI) on a thermally-treated carbon paper substrate. The battery performance was evaluated in a 5 cm 2 flow cell using a ‘zero-gap’ design with a 1.6 M VOSO 4 in 3 M H 2 SO 4 electrolyte. Charge-discharge of the VRFB was performed at a constant current density (ranging from 10 to 80 mA cm −2 ) with upper and lower voltage cut-offs of 1.65 and 0.8 V, respectively. Thermally treated carbon paper electrodes were tested as a comparison, and it was found that the VRFB efficiency was significantly enhanced, from 51% to 68% at a current density of 80 mA cm − 2 , due to the modification of the electrodes with Bi-PANI. The charge-discharge capacity was also improved by around 17.2%. In addition, the stability of the battery using the modified electrodes was evaluated for over 200 cycles. The improved battery performance was attributed to the catalytic effect of the Bi particles on the VO 2+ /VO 2 + and V 2+ /V 3+ redox reactions leading to a significant increase in capacity, voltage, and energy efficiency. References: [1] M. Skyllas-Kazacos, L. Cao, M. Kazacos, N. Kausar, A. Mousa, ChemSusChem. 9 (2016) 1521–1543. [2] A.K. Singh, M. Pahlevaninezhad, N. Yasri, E. Roberts, ChemSusChem. (2021). [3] M. Pahlevaninezhad, P. Leung, M. Pahlevani, F. C. Walsh, C. Ponce de Leon, and E. P. L. Roberts, Experimental and Computational Studies of Disperse Blue-1 in Organic Non-Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries, J. Power Sources, Volume 500, 15 July 2021, 229942. [4] X.Z. Yuan, C. Song, A. Platt, N. Zhao, H. Wang, H. Li, K. Fatih, D. Jang, Int. J. Energy Res. (2019). [5] S. Moon, B.W. Kwon, Y. Chung, Y. Kwon, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 166 (12) A2602-A2609 (2019) [6] W. Lee, C. Jo, S. Youk, H. Y. Shin, J. Lee, Y. Chung, and Y. Kwon, Appl. Surf. Sci., 429, 187 (2018) [7] Z González, A. Sánchez, C. Blanco, M. Granda, R. Menéndez, and R. Santamaria, Electrochem. Commun., 13, 1379 (2011). [8] B. Li, M. Gu, Z. Nie, Y. Shao, Q. Luo, X. wei, X. Li, J. Xiao, C. Wang, V. Sprenkle, and W. Wang, Nano Lett., 13, 1330 (2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207