The effects of glutamine supplementation on markers of apoptosis and autophagy in sickle cell disease peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: L-Glutamine was FDA-approved for sickle cell disease (SCD) in 2017, yet the mechanism(s)-of-action are poorly understood. This study investigates the potential activation of autophagy as a previously unexplored mechanism-of-benefit. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, 8-week, phase-2 trial of oral L-glutamine (10 g TID) in patients with SCD at risk for pulmonary hypertension identified by Doppler-echocardiography by an elevated tricuspid-regurgitant-jet-velocity (TRV)≥ 2.5 m/s. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from blood samples taken from SCD patients at baseline, two, four, six and eight weeks of glutamine therapy, and from controls at baseline; BAX (pro-apoptotic marker) and LC3-II/LC3-I (autophagy marker) were measured via western blot analysis to assess apoptosis and autophagy respectively. SETTING: Comprehensive SCD Center in Oakland, California. RESULTS: Patients with SCD (n = 8) had a mean age of 44 ± 16, 50% were male; 63% Hb-SS, and mean TRV= 3.1 ± 0.7 m/s. Controls' mean age (n = 5) was 32 ± 12% and 57% were male; all were Hb-AA with a mean TRV= 1.8 ± 0.6. At baseline, SCD-PBMCs had 2-times higher levels of BAX and LC3-I versus controls (both p = 0.03). Levels of BAX expression increased by 300% after 8-weeks of glutamine supplementation (p = 0.005); LC3-I protein levels decreased while LC3-II levels increased by 70%, giving a significant increase in the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PBMCs from glutamine-supplemented SCD patients have upregulated apoptotic and autophagy proteins. The parallel increase in BAX and the LC3-II / LC3-I ratio with glutamine supplementation suggest a possible role of autophagic cell death. The increase in apoptotic markers provide insight into a possible mechanism used by peripheral PBMCs during glutamine supplementation in patients with SCD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".