MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285483178 · doi:10.54056/tilf5708

The Driver Education and Licensing Project at Sipekne’katik First Nation

2020· article· en· W4285483178 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fred Wien, Stéphanie M. Doucet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceMathematics educationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[...]there is no municipal bus service.2 Although Halifax Transit stops at the Robert Stanfield International Airport, that location is about 30 kilometres from SFN. [...]family and friends are pressed into service, or a local "taxi" can be engaged; but many residents cannot afford the cost. A year later, as we are nearing the end of the work with this group, another 102 adults have applied to be part of a second cohort - an unprecedented response for any initiative at SFN, and an indication of just how important the transportation issue is for community members. In addition to two Band Council members, the Committee includes the Native Employment Officer for SFN, the DELP coordinator, and an administrative trainee, and representation from organizations such as Mi'kmaq Legal Support Network, Mi'kmaq Employment and Training Secretariat, Dalhousie University, and the provincial Registry of Motor Vehicles, Court Services and Aboriginal Affairs. Financial support was obtained from the grant supporting the Poverty Action Research Project provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and administered through Dalhousie University, as well as grants from the Nova Scotia Building Vibrant Communities Fund, the Native Council of Nova Scotia accessing funds from Service Canada, Mi'kmaq Employment and Training, and the Sipekne'katik

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyFrench-language works237,207