MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285497060 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-014551mtgabs

Understanding the Role of Liquid Electrolytes in Performance Improvement of Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

2022· article· en· W4285497060 on OpenAlexaff
Shuo Yan, Ali Akbar Merati, Chae-Ho Yim, Elena A. Baranova, Arnaud Weck, Yaser Abu‐Lebdeh

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials scienceCathodeLithium (medication)AnodeBattery (electricity)Chemical engineeringLithium metalIonic conductivityMetalFast ion conductorConductivityElectrodeChemistryMetallurgyPower (physics)Physical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) Solid-State Electrolytes (SSEs) enable Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries (SSLMBs) with high power density due to their superior ionic conductivity over 1 mS cm-1 at room temperature and good chemical stability against Lithium (Li) metal. A major cause of failure in SSLMBs is the large interfacial resistance between LLZO and electrodes. The high resistance at the interfaces is normally associated with insufficient solid-solid surface contact. It is a common practice to introduce a Liquid Electrolyte (LE) in SSLMBs either in combination with SSEs to form quasi-solid electrolytes or as the interface to enhance battery cycling performance. Several studies are conducted on resolving the contact issue between LLZO and the Li-metal anode but very few focused on the LLZO/cathode interface. In this research, a carbonate-based LE was introduced at the interface of Li6.5La2.9Ba0.1Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 (LLBZTO) | LiNi0.6Mn0.6Co0.2O2 (NMC 622) cathode with the aim of understanding the mechanism which the LE enhances the SSLMBs performance, using the Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscopy (STXM) and X-ray Absorption Scanning (XAS). The assembled Li | LLBZTO SSEs | LE | NMC 622 cell exhibited an initial discharge capacity of 168 mAh g-1 with a capacity retention ratio of ~82 % after 30 cycles. The results from the STXM revealed the reactions of the LE with LLZO and NMC 622. The XAS analysis showed the formation of two new interfaces: Cathode-Electrolyte Interface (CEI) and Solid-Liquid Electrolyte Interface (SLEI). Also, the result indicated that the LE decomposed completely in the cell after 30 cycles and transformed to a dense and robust SLEI. This in turn led to the enhanced interfacial contact with the cathode and an improved Li+ ion transport at the interface. In addition, fluorides (i.e., LiF and LaF3) and carbonates (i.e., Li2CO3) were confirmed as the main components of the SLEI. In this study, two interfaces in SSLMBs (CEI and SLEI) were characterized. Fully understanding the roles of LE as the interface would enhance the practical application of quasi-solid electrolytes in SSLMBs. Keywords Solid-state lithium metal batteries; Garnet; Interface; Ceramic electrolyte; STXM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207