MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285497294 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-012303mtgabs

5V Solid-State Lithium Batteries Using Garnet-Based Electrolytes and LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Spinel Cathode Composite

2022· article· en· W4285497294 on OpenAlexaff
Svetlana Niketic, Gina Filoso, Mohamed Houache, Zouina Karkar, Chae-Ho Yim, Yaser Abu‐Lebdeh

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials scienceCathodeLithium (medication)Gravimetric analysisCeramicIonic conductivitySpinelComposite numberPerovskite (structure)Fast ion conductorOxideChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an ever increasing demand to increase the gravimetric and volumetric energy density of Lithium batteries as well as enhancing their safety cycle life and lower safety. Solid-State batteries (SSB) enjoy a great attention nowadays due to their potential to meet all those requirements and power the EV revolution. The use of solid electrolytes (SE) in commercial batteries has been solely limited to polymer electrolytes based on poly(ethylene oxide), PEO, coupled with LiFePO4 (LFP) that are limited by the oxidative stability of PEO to < 3.6 V and the low potential of LFP at 3.4 V. The commercial cells are cycled at high temperature (45 ⁰C) to overcome the modest ambient ionic conductivity of the SE and under a stack pressure and a cathode composite to overcome the high interfacial resistances of the solid-solid interfaces. A cathode composite is made of conventional cathode components with a "catholyte" added to the formulation. The catholyte is made of an optimized amount of an ionic conductor that is mostly derived from the solid electrolyte formulation. Very recent studies by our research group (1) and others (2) have shown that higher voltage cells can be made by using garnet or perovskite-based ceramic/polymer composites and LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 (NMC532) or LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 (NMC 622) layered cathodes reaching 4.2 V and can operate for few cycles. Herein, we extend the work in order to further increase the voltage of the SSB cells by using LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO) spinel cathode with its high potential of 4.7 V. The Tantalum-doped Lithium Lanthanum Zirconate, Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 (Ta-doped LLZO, LLZTO), of the garnet family of solid electrolytes has been selected as a SE due to their high ambient ionic conductivity, wide electrochemical stability window and good chemical stability against Li metal. PEO and other compatible polymers have been used to formulate composite SEs in thin films and their properties were studied and compared with LLZTO pellets. Cells have been made using composite cathode formulations composed of LNMO cathode as an active material, carbon black, conventional and novel binders and a SE-based and proprietary catholyte coupled with the SE films or pellets and thick/thin Li films. The short-term cycling performance of the cells assembled with selected SEs and composite cathodes along with other electrochemical results will be presented. References: (1) Hilal Al-Salih, Allan Huang, Chae-Ho Yim, Annica I. Freytag, Gillian R. Goward, Elena Baranova and Yaser Abu-Lebdeh, 2020, J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 070557. (2) P. López-Aranguren, X. Judez, M. Chakir, M. Armand and L. Buannic, 2020, J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 020548.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207