CHANGES IN THE LEADERSHIP PARADIGM IN XXI CENTURY ORGANIZATIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents a study of changes in the paradigm of leadership in accordance with modern challenges of the business environment and new requirements for the figure of the leader. The study of the paradigm of leadership is carried out through the prism of theoretical and historical conditions of its formation. Based on this, evolutionary changes of its development in the context of six basic periods with the indication of schools, theories, concepts, works and their representatives are defined. The current state of the leadership industry is analyzed on the examples of behavior of famous leaders, managers of foreign companies. The main problematic aspects of their behavior are identified. Based on researches conducted by reputable organizations in the US, Canada, as well as taking into account the Global Labor Force Index, the problem of employee dissatisfaction with their managers, leaders at work was identified. Research has shown that this problem has two aspects of origin: the first concerns the mismatch between real-world leadership and leadership in books, articles, and trainings; the second - concerns the manager himself, his behavior and relations with employees. It also focuses on such a weak side of leadership as lying. In particular, the main reasons for the lying of leaders are identified: 1) lies help to make relations better; 2) people experience stronger positive emotions when deceive ("emotional uplift of a liar"); 3) if a lie is repeated often enough and convincingly, it can become true (the Epid effect); 4) lies have become a common pattern of behavior both in everyday life and among the leaders of organizations on all continents, so little is condemned and held accountable. It has been proven that there is a close relationship between power and lies: those in power cheat more often, and the ability to cheat effectively gives more power. To get out of this situation, business organizations are invited to form a new type of leader-manager of the 5th level, the main characteristics of which are personal modesty, professional determination, dedication and honesty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".