Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article provides a primary analysis of the planography of one of the historical quarters of the settlement “Izhevsk Plant”. 272 objects and the remains of the foundations of four residential structures have been identified and investigated. The objects were correlated by date of occurrence, functional features and type. The development of the blocks began from the corners and moved to the center of the block streets. In total, there are eight residential buildings and, accordingly, estates associated with them. The main types of objects have been considered. The estates were divided into a yard, a household and garden parts. There was a yard area next to each building, empty of any objects. There were two large cellars with wooden structures inside and the material of the 19th — early 20th century, 4–8 meters from the house. The existence of a part of the pits in terms of material and filling can be explained by the presence of handicrafts among residents. In the center of the block, in the “back” part of the estates, there was a fenced vegetable garden area with wells. In the Soviet times, these houses were turned into “communal blocks of flats”, after which there was a significant redevelopment of the estates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it