Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pope Francis visited Bolivia.During his three-day stay, he repeated the message of his pastoral encyclical calling for a new global ecological ethic linking care for the earth-"our common home"-with care for the poor (Vatican 2015).Observers expected his message would have important echoes with Bolivia's indigenous president, Evo Morales, who has achieved international attention for his left-leaning economic policies, his advocacy for Bolivia's majority indigenous population, and his activism about global climate change.As I have described in previous chapters, since Morales's election, Bolivia has become a site of global inspiration for the Left.Bolivia's new 2009 constitution, with its revolutionary focus on decolonization and vivir bien, or living well, has sparked the imagination of people across the world.That spark was tangible at the Global Meeting of Social Movements in the lowland city of Santa Cruz, Bolivia.I joined thousands of delegates from across Latin America who came together to greet the pope and to discuss the Vatican's broad themes for social change: Madre Tierra, Techo, y Trabajo (Mother Earth, Housing, and Work).As the tropical rains pounded on the roof of the coliseum, people waved colorful banners from across the region illustrating the agendas of their groups.The participants gave rousing speeches about the efforts of social movements to end poverty and defend their lands against the depredations of transnational corporations."We are one single river, " declared an indigenous woman from Canada, "oppressed, colonized, and tortured." Over and over the speakers cried: "We are fighting one common enemy: global capitalism!!!" President Morales gave the final speech of the afternoon.Standing against a background of huge posters of global peacemakers, like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".