MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285585999 · doi:10.1117/12.2631515

In-flight Metis radiometric performance verification using the light retro-reflected from its door

2022· article· en· W4285585999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Casini, Vania Da Deppo, Paola Zuppella, Paolo Chioetto, Fabio Frassetto, M. Romoli, Federico Landini, M. Pancrazzi, V. Andretta, Yara De Leo, А. Бемпорад, Alain Jody Corso, Michele Fabi, Silvano Fineschi, F. Frassati, C. Grimani, G. Jerse, K. Heerlein, Alessandro Liberatore, Enrico Magli, G. Naletto, G. Nicolini, Maria Guglielmina Pelizzo, P. Romano, C. Sasso, U. Schuehle, D. Spadaro, M. Stangalini, T. Straus, Roberto Susino, L. Teriaca, M. Uslenghi, Marta Casti, P. Heinzel, A. Volpicelli

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisOrbiterOpticsSpacecraftRemote sensingStray lightCoronagraphPhysicsAstronomyComputer scienceGeologyExoplanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metis is the coronagraph on board the Solar Orbiter ESA/NASA mission, it is designed to study the solar corona by providing an artificial solar eclipse. Metis features two channels: the ultraviolet H I (121.6 nm) and the visible light (580-640 nm). This work is focalised on the latter. Radiometric performances have been tested on-ground using a flatfield panel (uniform illumination), and the in-flight stability can be verified through the light reflected from the instrument door. When the Sun light impacts on the spacecraft shield, a fraction is reflected in the direction of the door, which then partly reflects it inside Metis. The analysis of the door images confirms its integrity and that of its subsequent optical components, since the reflected intensity follows as expected a 1/r<sup>2</sup> law, r being the Sun-spacecraft distance. Further analysis is being performed on such images to verify the operating status of various elements of Metis. Complementary ray-tracing simulation studies on the door retro-reflectivity properties are also in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter WaveSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207