Anarchy and Higher Trade Equilibrium: A Study of the Russian Old Believer Monasteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper argues that anarchic communities may breach the dichotomy of anarchy and low level of trade versus the state and a high level of trade. In particular, some anarchic groups may favourably leverage the very fact of their statelessness and turn it into a competitive advantage, enabling a shift to a higher level of trade. In this vein, integration into the state is undesirable as it deprives the community of this competitive advantage and may move it to a lower trade equilibrium. To prove my hypothesis, I provide an account of the contemporary Russian old believer monasteries, located deep in the Siberian taiga. These monasteries continue to remain anarchic well into the 21st century, as their stateless existence gives them a claim to spiritual purity. This enables these monasteries to provide spiritual services to the old believers who are considered religiously impure after integrating into the state. Joining the Russian state would thus deprive the old believer monasteries of their claim to spiritual purity and, by extension, their ability to trade, rendering such action undesirable. As a result, the old believer monasteries remain stateless, while securing a high level of trade with the state-integrated old believers. This is evidenced by the presence of modern equipment, high tech goods, and significant financial resources—items that would be impossible to obtain in the taiga without extensive economic exchange.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".