Mouse and cellular models of <i>KPTN</i> -related disorder implicate mTOR signalling in cognitive and progressive overgrowth phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract KPTN -related disorder (KRD) is an autosomal recessive disorder associated with germline variants in KPTN ( kaptin ), a component of the mTOR regulatory complex KICSTOR. To gain further insights into the pathogenesis of KRD, we analysed mouse knockout and human stem cell KPTN loss-of-function models. Kptn −/− mice display many of the key KRD phenotypes, including brain overgrowth, behavioural abnormalities, and cognitive deficits. Assessment of affected individuals has identified concordant selectivity of cognitive deficits, postnatal onset of brain overgrowth, and a previously unrecognised KPTN dosage-sensitivity, resulting in increased head circumference in their heterozygous parents. Molecular and structural analysis of Kptn −/− mice revealed pathological changes, including differences in brain size, shape, and cell numbers primarily due to abnormal postnatal brain development. Both the mouse and differentiated iPSC models of the disorder display transcriptional and biochemical evidence for altered mTOR pathway signalling, supporting the role of KPTN in regulating mTORC1. Increased mTOR signalling downstream of KPTN is rapamycin sensitive, highlighting possible therapeutic avenues with currently available mTOR inhibitors. These findings place KRD in the broader group of mTORC1 related disorders affecting brain structure, cognitive function, and network integrity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".