MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285707568 · doi:10.5539/jas.v14n8p40

Abundance and Dynamics of the Main Heteroptera Pests of Cocoa Tree in the Orchards of the Department of Méagui (South-West, Côte d’Ivoire)

2022· article· en· W4285707568 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Trazié Kevin Guessan-Bi, Konan Lucien Kouame, Koffi Eric Kwadjo, Kouadio Dagobert Kra, Mamadou Doumbia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeteropteraPEST analysisBiologyDry seasonAbundance (ecology)PopulationWet seasonHemipteraCropCote d ivoireToxicologyHorticultureEcologyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capsids Sahlbergella singularis and Distantiella theobromae, the cocoa mosquito Helopeltis sp., and the green bug Bathycoelia thalassina are the main Heteroptera pests causing immense damage in cocoa fields in the department of Méagui, the main cocoa producing area of Côte d’Ivoire. The actual study was conducted to assess the spatial and temporal distribution of these pests in this department. From May 2020 to April 2021, the pest abundance and population dynamics were recorded once a month in seven selected cocoa farms in the localities of Yaodankro and Sérigbangan. Tarping and systematic search methods were used. The results indicated that the three types of insect pests are present and the abundance rates ranging from 20.83% to 42.22% from 15 910 individuals recorded. Capsids were more abundant in the Sérigbangan orchards than in those of Yaodankro, while the cocoa mosquito and the green bug were more abundant in Yaodankro than in Sérigbangan. The number of individuals remained relatively high throughout the year except in May-June (months of intense rainfall) where capsid and cocoa mosquito populations were less abundant. Peak populations occurred during the dry season (July, August, February, and March-April) and during the low/medium rainfall season (September and November). The cocoa mosquito and the green bug once considered minor pests were shown to be major pests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207