MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285734332 · doi:10.54097/ehss.v2i.827

A Comparative Study-- Sex Education in China and Sweden

2022· article· en· W4285734332 on OpenAlexaff
Yutong Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumChinaSex educationIdeologyHuman sexualitySubject (documents)PoliticsSociologyPublic relationsGender studiesPolitical sciencePedagogyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Politics, clan, and husband power significantly affect sex education for decades. Deeply rooted Confucianism keep Chinese people, sex is still a private subject in China. Although the country has carried out a series of measures, the improvement of sex education still faces challenges. Thus, this paper first examines the issues and challenges faced by China. In addition, the paper is enlightened by Sweden that possesses pioneering sex education. The findings revealed that sex education in Sweden not only aim to avoid unplanned births, but also deliver sexual knowledge and concept of interpersonal. Designing particular curriculum to deliver sexual knowledge for different ages students and incorporate sexual knowledge into other subjects. Besides, Sweden has well-designed organization and clinic which can popularize sexual knowledge from public. Learning from which is the pioneer of sex education, the curriculum of sex education should be delivered typically with discipline characteristics through biology, history, physical education and health, music, geography, and so on, to assure student acquire knowledge comprehensively. On the other hand, ideological change and policy support, innovative curriculum design and implementation, enhance sex education from public and community, and high-quality teacher training is the core to changing the current situation of China sex education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.282
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesSame topicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthFrench-language works237,207