Bibliographic record
Abstract
Politics, clan, and husband power significantly affect sex education for decades. Deeply rooted Confucianism keep Chinese people, sex is still a private subject in China. Although the country has carried out a series of measures, the improvement of sex education still faces challenges. Thus, this paper first examines the issues and challenges faced by China. In addition, the paper is enlightened by Sweden that possesses pioneering sex education. The findings revealed that sex education in Sweden not only aim to avoid unplanned births, but also deliver sexual knowledge and concept of interpersonal. Designing particular curriculum to deliver sexual knowledge for different ages students and incorporate sexual knowledge into other subjects. Besides, Sweden has well-designed organization and clinic which can popularize sexual knowledge from public. Learning from which is the pioneer of sex education, the curriculum of sex education should be delivered typically with discipline characteristics through biology, history, physical education and health, music, geography, and so on, to assure student acquire knowledge comprehensively. On the other hand, ideological change and policy support, innovative curriculum design and implementation, enhance sex education from public and community, and high-quality teacher training is the core to changing the current situation of China sex education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".