Frequency Doubling Technology Visual Field Loss in Fabry Subjects Related to Retinal Ganglion Cell Function as Explored by ERG and OSOME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate potential causes of FDT visual field loss in a selected group of Fabry subjects. Patients and Methods: This is a pilot observational study. Subjects were assessed during 2 visits. The following tests were performed: visual acuity, tonometry, optical coherence tomography (OCT) optic nerve scan, frequency doubling time (FDT) and threshold (SAP) VF, ERG, and Online Spectro-reflectometry Oxygenation Measurement in the Eye (OSOME). Results are compared across visits and, when indicated, interpreted against those collected on non-Fabry population matched for age and sex. Results: The study population was composed of 3 males (34.3 ± 8.9 y.o.) and 5 females (46.4 ± 6.5 y.o). For all subjects, BCVA remained 6/6 OU throughout the study and OCT optic nerve scans were normal. FDT showed a defect in at least 1 quadrant for all participants, in contrast with SAP. FDT PSD value was found different vs SAP. For ERG, the i-wave (52.1 + 2.7 ms) and B-waves (31.6 ± 2.1 ms) peak times were significantly longer compared to a non-Fabry population (p < 0.05). Overall blood oxygenation varied from 61.3% ± 4% to 68.1% ± 4% at the second visit, suggesting a loss of capillary perfusion. Blood volume varied based on location (superior/inferior), eye tested (OD/OS) and time (visit 1/2). The range of values exceeds normal subjects findings (p < 0.05). Blood volume was correlated to FDT PSD value for the superior area of the optic nerve. Conclusion: The results suggest that Fabry subjects present FDT deficits and abnormal ERG patterns that may be explained by a retinal dysfunction affecting retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), second to vascular alterations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".