School Principals and Inclusive Schools: A Case Study of Complex Contexts and Competing Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Case studies have increasingly been used in the field of Education to help school teachersand principals engage in reflection and effective practices. This case study is particularlyrelevant to the dilemmas encountered when supporting students with disabilities in schools.The school principal in the case, Mr. Thomas Donaldson, is committed to supporting allstudents in the school. Mr. Donaldson believes that students’ attachment to school formsthrough healthy relationships built on empathy and commitment between teachers andstudents. Teachers require time, compassion, and professional learning opportunities to bestsupport students with disabilities in ways that result in positive changes for everyone. Mr.Donaldson tries to approach his teachers the same way: He seeks to know and understand thediverse needs and values of his teachers and offers them his perspectives on inclusive,meaningful learning opportunities in the hope of provoking change. The case study beginswith a description of the context in which the school is situated. The case then presents theperspectives of Mr. Donaldson and three new teachers before the start of the school year.These perspectives provide a backdrop to the realities principals face as they strive togenerate cohesive approaches infused from inclusive ideals and guided in the realities theirstudents live. Meeting the needs of his teachers and their students, Mr. Donaldson looksforward to cultivating a healthy inclusive school atmosphere. The case concludes with ananalysis of key aspects including attachment, teacher efficacy, and inclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".