Differential regional cerebrovascular reactivity to end-tidal gas combinations commonly seen during anaesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regional cerebrovascular reactivity (rCVR) is highly variable in the human brain as measured by blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI to changes in both end-tidal CO 2 and O 2 . OBJECTIVES: We examined awake participants under carefully controlled end-tidal gas concentrations to assess how regional CVR changes may present with end-tidal gas changes seen commonly with anaesthesia. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre, Winnipeg, Canada. The imaging for the study occurred in 2019. SUBJECTS: Twelve healthy adult subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Cerebral BOLD response was studied under two end-tidal gas paradigms. First end-tidal oxygen (ETO 2 ) maintained stable whereas ETCO 2 increased incrementally from hypocapnia to hypercapnia (CO 2 ramp); second ETCO 2 maintained stable whereas ETO 2 increased from normoxia to hyperoxia (O 2 ramp). BOLD images were modeled with end-tidal gas sequences split into two equal segments to examine regional CVR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The voxel distribution comparing hypocapnia to mild hypercapnia and mild hyperoxia (mean F I O 2 = 0.3) to marked hyperoxia (mean F I O 2 = 0.7) were compared in a paired fashion ( P < 0.005 to reach threshold for voxel display). Additionally, type analysis was conducted on CO 2 ramp data. This stratifies the BOLD response to the CO 2 ramp into four categories of CVR slope based on segmentation (type A; +/+slope: normal response, type B +/-, type C -/-: intracranial steal, type D -/+.) Types B to D represent altered responses to the CO 2 stimulus. RESULTS: Differential regional responsiveness was seen for both end-tidal gases. Hypocapnic regional CVR was more marked than hypercapnic CVR in 0.3% of voxels examined ( P < 0.005, paired comparison); the converse occurred in 2.3% of voxels. For O 2 , mild hyperoxia had more marked CVR in 0.2% of voxels compared with greater hyperoxia; the converse occurred in 0.5% of voxels. All subjects had altered regional CO 2 response based on Type Analysis ranging from 4 ± 2 to 7 ± 3% of voxels. CONCLUSION: In awake subjects, regional differences and abnormalities in CVR were observed with changes in end-tidal gases common during the conduct of anaesthesia. On the basis of these findings, consideration could be given to minimising regional CVR fluctuations in patients-at-risk of neurological complications by tighter control of end-tidal gases near the individual's resting values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".