Physics with Continuum Energy Fields of Particles:Unified Equations of Motion from Planetary Motion to Quantum Mechanics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The premise is that two energy fields influence all motion in classical physics. The first is the omnipresent Cosmic Background, the existence of which has been suspected for over a century, but with significant disagreement on the intensity. The second is the Mass Energy Field (ME) hypothesis on the existence of a localised energy field around every particle with mass and/or momentum. The spatial integral of the ME field for every massed particle is given by Einstein’s Mass Energy Equivalence Principle. The ME model leads to startling simplifications of several problems of significance of the past century that were considered almost intractable and required genius innovations: Einstein’s General Relativity (in the Solar System), 1916; Dirac Wave Function, 1928; and the Lamb Shift, 1947. The ME solutions, based on classical physics and conforming to Special Relativity, are simple, compact and do not require spacetime curvature, vacuum fluctuations, or renormalisation. For micro particles the ME model indicates a possible analytic expression for the Casimir Force, Lamb Shift, and the Strong Nuclear Force. The ME field around a massed particle, and the similar momentum energy field around a photon provide a plausible explanation for the century old vexing conundrum of wave-particle duality and points to a possible communication mechanism between quantum entangled particles. The Muon g-factor, computed with the ME expression, very different from existing QED theory, agrees with the measured value to 12 parts per billion. The ME theory shows exact agreement with General Relativity effects within the Solar System.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".