Updated variant curation expert panel criteria and pathogenicity classifications for 251 variants for <i>RYR1</i> -related malignant hyperthermia susceptibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ClinGen malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) variant curation expert panel specified the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathologists (ACMG/AMP) criteria for RYR1-related MHS and a pilot analysis of 84 variants was published. We have now classified an additional 251 variants for RYR1-related MHS according to current ClinGen standards and updated the criteria where necessary. Criterion PS4 was modified such that individuals with multiple RYR1 variants classified as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) were not considered as providing evidence for pathogenicity. Criteria PS1 and PM5 were revised to consider LP variants at the same amino-acid residue as providing evidence for pathogenicity at reduced strength. Finally, PM1 was revised such that if PS1 or PM5 are used PM1, if applicable, should be downgraded to supporting. Of the 251 RYR1 variants, 42 were classified as P/LP, 16 as B/LB, and 193 as VUS. The primary driver of 175 VUS classifications was insufficient evidence supporting pathogenicity, rather than evidence against pathogenicity. Functional data supporting PS3/BS3 was identified for only 13 variants. Based on the posterior probabilities of pathogenicity and variant frequencies in gnomAD, we estimated the prevalence of individuals with RYR1-related MHS pathogenic variants to be between 1/300 and 1/1075, considerably higher than current estimates. We have updated ACMG/AMP criteria for RYR1-related MHS and classified 251 variants. We suggest that prioritization of functional studies is needed to resolve the large number of VUS classifications and allow for appropriate risk assessment. RYR1-related MHS pathogenic variants are likely to be more common than currently appreciated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.066 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".