MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285818133 · doi:10.2298/tem2201007f

Justice for crime victims: has the time finally come for a radical paradigm shift?

2022· article· en· W4285818133 on OpenAlexaff
Ezzat A. Fattah

Bibliographic record

VenueTemida · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPunishment (psychology)Retributive justiceEconomic JusticeCriminologySociologyState (computer science)LawPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How is it that punishment has become synonymous with justice and that justice has become a euphemism for punishment? How is it that justice and punishment have become almost interchangeable terms? How is it that slogans such as ?justice for victims? are invariably interpreted as demands for more and harsher punishments. Is punishment truly synonymous with justice? Are crime victims really bloodthirsty and totally obsessed with a quest for punishment? A troubling question that has haunted me throughout my professional life, a question that I spent many sleepless nights trying to find the answer to, is: How could it be that punishment, the deliberate infliction of pain and suffering, the deprivation of liberty, or deliberately putting a human being full of life to death be called or perceived as justice and be seen as the most appropriate response to victims? sufferings? How is it that victims who, as Nils Christie said, are the primary owners of the conflict (Christie, 1977) whose property rights were usurped, and whose rightful dues paid to them in the form of ?Wergeld? or the composition was expropriated by the state, were led to believe that justice is vengeance and retaliation and that the harsher the punishment, the more just is the judgment? How is it that the theological and abstract notions of retribution, expiation, atonement and penitence became so entrenched in people?s minds that no rational thinking, no scientific evidence, no economic crisis, no humanitarian endeavour seems to be capable of shaking such religious beliefs or lessening the incessant demands for punishment? How is it that punishment has become so universally accepted, extremely popular and so widely practised that people and governments, even in the harshest economic times, are more than willing to waste billions and billions of dollars for no other reason but to inflict pain and suffering on those fellow citizens who have violated man-made laws? The time has come to ask whether 21st century society has undergone a social, cultural and moral evolution that makes the retributive ?justice for victims? paradigm ripe for a radical shift? These are just some of the complex and difficult questions that are begging for answers and that will be examined in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.090
Scholarly communication0.0260.049
Open science0.0070.014
Research integrity0.0320.065
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTemidaSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207