MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285819569 · doi:10.21037/atm-22-3212

Effect of body mass index on postoperative mechanical alignment and long-term outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study of 671 knees

2022· article· en· W4285819569 on OpenAlex
Jian Cao, Ze-Xi Li, Wei Feng, Hong Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Translational Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversitySichuan UniversityDepartment of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province
KeywordsMedicineBody mass indexWOMACOverweightOsteoarthritisCohortRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionIncidence (geometry)Physical therapyArthroplastyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A high body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased rates of complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no study has examined the effect of BMI on lower limb alignment using the World Health Organization's (WHO) BMI classification. We believe that the WHO's BMI classification allows a uniform standard worldwide. We sought to investigate the potential association between a high BMI and the incidence of postoperative misalignment. We also evaluated whether a higher BMI is associated with worse clinical function. Methods: ). Both weight and height were measured by nurses on admission. Patients' preoperative HKA, gender, age, and side of surgery were collected as baseline. All the patients underwent standing, weight-bearing, full-length radiography before and after surgery to measure the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). We followed up patients by telephone. Among the BMI subgroups, we compared the knee function scores, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society-Knee Score (KS-KS), Knee Society-Function Score (KS-FS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and range of motion (ROM). A multivariate linear regression analysis and a logistic regression was conducted to examine the outcomes. Results: The study had a mean follow-up period of 8.16 years. The multivariate and logistic regression analyses revealed that preoperative alignment (P=0.002) and a higher BMI (P=0.015) were associated with a higher risk of postoperative misalignment. The WOMAC scores were higher in the normal and overweight groups than the other groups (P=0.022). The FJS and KS-KS gradually decreased as BMI increased. Conclusions: A higher BMI is associated with a greater risk of misalignment and worse long-term clinical outcome after TKA. When treating patients with high BMI, we should pay more attention to the adjustment of lower limb alignment intraoperatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it