PERAN KONSELING APOTEKER TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN PENGGUNAAN OBAT DENGAN SEDIAAN KHUSUS DI KETANGGUNGAN – BREBES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Counseling is a precious job as known as pharmacists have a provide pharmaceutical services. Counseling given to the publics for drug therapy, treatment, and the drugs with special dosage form is very important to increase publics knowledge. The purpose of this study was to increase the awareness of pharmacists to counseling provide to the public, and increase the public knowledge when using the drugs with special dosage form in Ketanggungan – Brebes regency. Fifty respondents who participated in this study with observasional cohort design. The data collection in pre-test and post-test prospective. Analysis test used is non parametric t test using Wilcoxon alternative test. The last education status of respondents was dominated by Senior High School and the monthly visit to the pharmacy was less than five times as 27 respondents. The results obtained from this study are p = 0.001 and the mean difference is 11.22 with pre-test score mean was 27,54 and post-test was 38,76. There are significant results on the knowledge of the use of drugs with special dosage form after the pharmacist provides counseling. Keywords: pharmacist, counsleing, drugs, pharmaceutical care, knowledge
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".