MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285891829 · doi:10.1101/2022.07.18.22277791

Detection of maternal serum unmetabolized folic acid following multivitamin and mineral supplementation with or without folic acid after 12 weeks’ gestation: a randomized controlled trial

2022· preprint· en· W4285891829 on OpenAlexaff
Dian Caturini Sulistyoningrum, Thomas Sullivan, Monika Skubisz, Debra J. Palmer, Simon Wood, Marten F. Snel, Paul J. Trim, Maria Makrides, Tim Green, Karen P Best

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilWomen's and Children's Hospital FoundationUniversity of AdelaideAustralian GovernmentChildren's Hospital FoundationSouth Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteMedical Research CouncilMcKnight Foundation
KeywordsMultivitaminGestationMedicinePregnancyRandomized controlled trialMicronutrientFolic acidVitaminPhysiologyInternal medicineObstetricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Pregnant women are advised to take folic acid supplements before conception and during the first three months of pregnancy. Many women continue folic acid supplementation throughout pregnancy, and concerns have been raised about associations between excess folic acid intake and adverse child health outcomes. Unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) is found in serum at higher folic acid intakes and has been proposed as a biomarker for excess folic acid intake. Objective To determine if removing folic acid from prenatal multivitamin and mineral supplements after 12 weeks of pregnancy reduces concentrations of serum UMFA at 36 weeks’ gestation. Design A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy 12-16-weeks’ gestation were randomly assigned to a multi-micronutrient supplement containing no folic acid (intervention) or 800 µg folic acid/day (control) from enrolment until 36 weeks’ gestation. Maternal serum was analyzed for UMFA and secondary outcomes of red blood cell and serum folate at 36 weeks’ gestation. Results UMFA was detected in most of the 103 randomized women (86% >limit of detection). However, only 12% (n=11/90) of serum samples were above the limit of quantification (0.55 nmol/L), preventing analysis of UMFA concentrations. Fewer women had detectable UMFA in the no folic acid group compared to the 800 µg folic acid group (72% [n=33/46] vs. 98% [n=43/44]; p = 0.001). Maternal serum and red blood cell folate concentrations were lower in the no folic acid intervention group compared to the control group (median 23.2 vs. 49.3 nmol/L, 1335 vs. 1914 nmol/L, respectively; p< 0.,001) and no woman was classified as folate deficient. Conclusions Removing folic acid from prenatal multivitamin and mineral supplements reduced the number of women with detectable UMFA at 36 weeks’ gestation, however, differences in UMFA concentration between treatment groups were not quantifiable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicFolate and B Vitamins Research→French-language works237,207→