MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286005501 · doi:10.1094/pdis-05-22-1209-re

Genome-Wide Association Mapping in Sunflower (<i>Helianthus annuus</i>) Reveals Common Loci and Putative Candidate Genes for Resistance to <i>Diaporthe gulyae</i> and <i>D. helianthi</i> Causing Phomopsis Stem Canker

2022· article· en· W4286005501 on OpenAlex
Renan Guidini, Mojtaba Jahani, Kaichi Huang, Loren H. Rieseberg, Febina M. Mathew

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSunflower and Safflower Cultivation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHelianthus annuusCankerPhomopsisPathosystemSunflowerQuantitative trait locusCandidate genePlant disease resistanceBlightGeneticsInoculationBotanyHorticultureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diaporthe gulyae and D. helianthi cause Phomopsis stem canker of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in the United States. Because Phomopsis stem canker did not gain importance until the disease epidemic in 2010, limited studies were conducted to understand the genetic basis of sunflower resistance to D. gulyae and D. helianthi. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the United States Department of Agriculture cultivated accessions for resistance to D. gulyae and D. helianthi as well as to utilize genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and putative candidate genes underlying those loci common to both organisms. For each fungus, 213 accessions were screened in a complete randomized design in the greenhouse and the experiment was repeated once. Six plants per accession were inoculated with a single isolate of D. gulyae or D. helianthi at four to six true leaves using the mycelium-contact inoculation method. At 15 days (D. gulyae) and 30 days (D. helianthi) postinoculation, accessions were evaluated for disease severity and compared with the susceptible confection inbred PI 552934. GWAS identified 28 QTLs common to the two fungi, and 24 genes overlapped close to these QTLs. Additionally, it was observed that the resistance QTLs derived mainly from landraces rather than from wild species. Seventeen putative candidate genes associated with resistance to D. gulyae or D. helianthi were identified that may be related to plant–pathogen interactions. These findings advanced our understanding of the genetic basis of resistance to D. gulyae and D. helianthi and will help develop resources for genomics-assisted breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it