Incipient collision of the Rae and Slave cratons at ca. 1.95 Ga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Incipient collision between the Rae and Slave cratons represents a critical initial stage in the final assembly of the composite Laurentian craton. However, the timing and kinematics of this event remain poorly constrained. Here, we integrate phase equilibria modeling and Lu-Hf garnet and U-Pb monazite and zircon petrochronology to precisely date the timing of peak metamorphism along the Great Slave Lake shear zone, the central segment of the western Rae cratonic margin that was the locus of terminal Rae-Slave collision. Zircon and monazite U-Pb ages broadly constrain prograde-to-peak metamorphism to 1933–1913 Ma, whereas the timing of upperamphibolite facies peak metamorphism (0.8–1.0 GPa and 750–800 °C) is best constrained by two garnet Lu-Hf ages of 1931 ± 12 and 1917 ± 6 Ma. Our results highlight the inherent strengths and limitations of garnet, monazite, and zircon petrochronology in the context of dating Paleoproterozoic-aged metamorphism. Based on the timing of crustal thickening constrained by Lu-Hf garnet geochronology, we posit that the Slave craton first collided with the western Rae margin at ca. 1950 Ma. Taken together with prior constraints on the timing of metamorphism elsewhere along the western Rae margin, we propose incipient collision was followed by the northwards zippering of the margins and the eventual ~500 km of dextral translation of the Slave craton along the Great Slave Lake shear zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".