A Comprehensive Review on Traffic Control Modeling for Obtaining Sustainable Objectives in a Freeway Traffic Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic control strategy plays a significant role in obtaining sustainable objectives because it not only improves traffic mobility but also enhances traffic management systems. It has been developed and applied by the research community in recent years and still offers various challenges and issues that may require the attention of researchers and engineers. Recent technological developments toward connected and automated vehicles are beneficial for improving traffic safety and achieving sustainable goals. There is a need to develop a survey on traffic control techniques, which could provide the recent developments in the traffic control strategy and could be useful in obtaining sustainable goals. This survey presents a comprehensive investigation of traffic control techniques by carefully reviewing existing methods from a new perspective and reviews various traffic control strategies that play an important role in achieving sustainable objectives. First, we present traffic control modeling techniques that provide a robust solution to obtain reasonable traffic and sustainable mobilities. These techniques could be helpful for enhancing the traffic flow in a freeway traffic environment. Then, we discuss traffic control strategies that could be helpful for researchers and practitioners to design a robust freeway traffic controller. Second, we present a comprehensive review of recent state-of-the-art methods on the vehicle design control strategy, which is followed by the traffic control design strategy. They aim to reduce traffic emissions and energy consumption by a vehicle. Finally, we present the open research challenges and outline some recommendations which could be beneficial for obtaining sustainable goals in traffic systems and help researchers understand various technical aspects in the deployment of traffic control systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".