The Development of Canada’s Pacific Gateway in the Age of Steam Globalization 1871-1939
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The completion of the Canadian Pacific Railway in 1886 made British Columbia’s coast Canada’s Pacific Gateway. Meanwhile, global trade boomed and growing marine traffic was supported by the systematic charting of the intricately indented British Columbia coastline, improved port infrastructure, and the creation of ship repair facilities. The opening of the Panama Canal in 1914 also resulted in a major boost to the Pacific Gateway. Vancouver became the dominant BC port and competed with eastern Canada for exports. This paper examines the main traffic flows through the Pacific Gateway and the development of its ports between 1871 and the start of the Second World War. L’achèvement du chemin de fer Canadien Pacifique en 1886 a fait de la côte de la Colombie-Britannique la porte d’entrée canadienne du Pacifique. En même temps, le commerce Mondial était en plein essor et l’augmentation de la circulation maritime était appuyée par la cartographie systématique de la côte découpée de la Colombie-Britannique, l’amélioration des infrastructures portuaires et la création d’installations de réparation de navires. L’ouverture du canal de Panama en 1914 a également donné un sérieux coup de pouce à la porte d’entrée du Pacifique. Vancouver est devenue le port le plus important de la Colombie-Britannique, faisant concurrence à l’est du Canada pour les exportations. Le présent article analyse les principaux courants de circulation dans la porte d’entrée du Pacifique et le développement de ses ports entre 1871 et le début de la Seconde Guerre mondiale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".