MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286248888 · doi:10.24252/msa.v10i1.29869

Proyeksi Produksi Padi Kabupaten Pinrang Dengan Metode Singular Spectrum Analysis

2022· article· en· W4286248888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Irwan Irwan, Adnan Sauddin, Anita Kaimuddin

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal MSA ( Matematika dan Statistika serta Aplikasinya ) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic shortageProduction (economics)MathematicsStatisticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural sciencePopulationValue (mathematics)Yield (engineering)Agricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceGeographyEconomicsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing population growth in Pinrang Regency every year had an impact on increasing the need for food, especially rice production which was generally a staple food source in Pinrang Regency. so it was necessary to do a forecast to anticipate future food shortages. This study aimed to determine the yield of rice production in Pinrang Regency in 2021 and the level of accuracy of the method used. The results of the study obtained forecast for rice production in Pinrang Regency in 2021 using the Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) method, respectively from the first quarter to the third quarter of 33603 tons, 25988 tons, and 43234 tons with the level of forecasting accuracy based on standard MAPE value obtained by 4.97 %. The MAPE value obtained was less than 10 % and close to 0 %, meaning that the SSA method with windows length 9 and 7 groups were very accurate to be used to predict rice production in Pinrang Regency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal MSA ( Matematika dan Statistika serta Aplikasinya )Same topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207