MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: Subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-826.

2022· article· en· W4286296256 on OpenAlexaff
Krishnansu S. Tewari, Nicoletta Colombo, Bradley J. Monk, Coraline Dubot, M. Valeria Cáceres, Kosei Hasegawa, Ronnie Shapira‐Frommer, Pamela Salman, Eduardo Yáñez, Mahmut Gümüş, Vanessa Samouëlian, Vincent Castonguay, Alexander Arkhipov, Cumhur Tekin, Kan Li, Sarper Toker, Stephen J. O’Keefe, Domenica Lorusso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarboplatinPembrolizumabAdenosquamous carcinomaOncologyInternal medicineCervical cancerPopulationChemotherapyAdenocarcinomaHazard ratioCisplatinCancerConfidence intervalImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5506 Background: In KEYNOTE-826 (NCT03635567),pembrolizumab (pembro) + chemotherapy (chemo) ± bevacizumab (bev) provided statistically significant, clinically meaningful PFS and OS improvements in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. In the present analysis of KEYNOTE-826, we assessed outcomes in several key patient subgroups. Methods: Eligible adult patients had persistent, recurrent, or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix not previously treated with chemo and not amenable to curative treatment; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; ECOG PS 0–1; and a tumor sample to determine PD-L1 status. Patients were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or placebo (pbo) for up to 35 cycles + chemo (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) ± bev 15 mg/kg. Dual primary endpoints are PFS by investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1 and OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, all comers, and CPS ≥10. Treatment effects on PFS and OS were examined in patient subgroups defined by bev use (yes or no), histology (squamous or non-squamous [including adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous]), platinum use (carboplatin or cisplatin), and prior chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs were based on a stratified Cox regression model. Results: 617 patients were randomized (pembro + chemo ± bev, n=308; pbo + chemo ± bev, n=309). At the May 3, 2021 data cutoff, median follow-up was 22 months. Pembro + chemo prolonged PFS and OS vs pbo + chemo in all subgroups evaluated in the all-comer population (Table). Similar benefits of pembro + chemo on PFS and OS were also seen in the protocol-specified CPS ≥1 and CPS ≥10 populations. Conclusions: Pembro + chemo ± bev prolonged PFS and OS vs pbo + chemo ± bev among the subgroups defined by bev use, histology, platinum use, and prior CRT and provided clinically meaningful benefits similar to the broader population of patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03635567. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→