MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Emotion and symptom-focused engagement (EASE): A multisite randomized controlled trial of an intervention for individuals with acute leukemia.

2022· article· en· W4286298670 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kyle Fitzgibbon, Carmine Malfitano, Anne Rydall, Breffni Hannon, Harriet Richardson, Aaron D. Schimmer, Camilla Zimmermann, Gary Rodin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialPsychosocialPsychological interventionPalliative careDistressIntervention (counseling)PsychiatryPhysical therapyClinical psychologyNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS7072 Background: Acute leukemia (AL) is characterized by rapid symptom onset requiring urgent hospitalization and initiation of intensive treatment with high mortality. Despite this, there is scant research on its psychological and physical impacts and even less on interventions to alleviate them [Bryant 2016]. We conducted a longitudinal study showing substantial physical and psychological distress in these patients [Rodin 2013; Zimmermann 2013; Nissim 2013; Nissim 2014; Gheihman 2016; Rodin 2018a; Shaulov 2019]. Despite this distress, we observed a lack of referrals for specialized psychosocial and palliative care. Based on these findings, we developed an integrated psychosocial and early palliative care (symptom control) intervention, Emotion And Symptom-focused Engagement (EASE), for AL [Rodin 2015]. In a subsequent randomized phase II trial of EASE in patients newly diagnosed with AL, we demonstrated its feasibility and found preliminary evidence that it reduces physical and psychological distress compared to usual care [Rodin 2020]. EASE includes: i) an 8-week manualized psychotherapy intervention tailored to AL to prevent and treat psychological symptoms through: supportive counselling and trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy; and emotional assessment and affect modulation; ii) 4-week systematic screening of physical symptoms with automatic referrals to palliative care for the management of moderate to severe symptoms. Methods: We are conducting a multi-centre randomized controlled phase III trial of 266 AL patients comparing EASE to usual care in collaboration with the Canadian Cancer Trials Group at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Kingston Health Sciences and the Ottawa Hospital in Ontario, Canada. Patients are newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia and randomized within two weeks of hospital admission for induction chemotherapy with curative intent. Patients randomized to EASE will receive psychological support from a trained mental health clinician for 8 weeks and will be assessed for physical symptoms twice weekly until discharged from hospital. Moderate to severe physical symptoms will trigger a referral to a symptom-control team for symptom management. The symptom-control team consists of a physician and nurse with expertise in symptom control and other professionals as needed. All participants will be assessed for physical symptom severity, psychological distress, quality of life and satisfaction with care at baseline, 4, 8, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Hypotheses will be tested using multilevel modeling (MLM) with maximum likelihood estimation, conducted as intention-to-treat analyses. The DMC last reviewed the trial in April 2021 and suggested that the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT04224974.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→