On-treatment plasma ctDNA fraction and treatment outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5051 Background: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) are standard of care for treatment-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but primary or rapidly acquired resistance is common. Early identification of resistant disease is critical for improving management strategies. We investigated whether on-treatment changes in plasma ctDNA fraction (ctDNA%; the proportion of cell-free DNA that is tumor-derived) associate with ARPI treatment outcomes. Methods: We collected serial plasma cell-free DNA from 81 patients with mCRPC: at baseline and following 4 weeks of treatment during two prospective multi-center observational studies (NCT02426333; NCT02471469). CtDNA% was calculated by integrating deep targeted and shallow whole-genome sequencing. Samples were dichotomized at above and below 1%, and designated as high or low ctDNA%, respectively. Outcome measurements were radiographic and/or clinical progression-free survival (rcPFS) and overall survival (OS). Non-durable responses were defined as rcPFS < 6 months, excluding patients with PSA progression alone (n = 3) or treatment cessation for toxicity (n = 4). Results: Median follow-up was 27.4 months (IQR 17.7-34.9). CtDNA% was high in 47/81 (58%) patients at baseline and 29/81 (36%) patients at 4 weeks. The median ctDNA% for patients with high ctDNA was 15.0% (IQR 4.9-43.8%) at baseline and 5.0% (IQR 2.0-20.6%) at 4 weeks. High baseline ctDNA% was prognostic for rcPFS and OS (Table). RcPFS and OS was shortest for patients that retained high ctDNA% at 4 weeks. However, patients converting from high to low ctDNA% at 4 weeks did not experience different outcomes to patients with low ctDNA at both timepoints. ctDNA% associations with rcPFS and OS were independent of established clinical prognostic factors. 23/27 (85%) patients experiencing non-durable responses had high ctDNA% at baseline and 4 weeks. Only 3/47 patients (6%) experiencing durable responses had high ctDNA% at both timepoints. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting non-durable response was 85% and 94%, respectively. Conclusions: Early changes in ctDNA% are strongly linked to duration of first-line ARPI treatment benefit in mCRPC and may have utility for informing clinical trials testing early therapy switches in patients unlikely to experience durable disease responses. Clinical trial information: NCT02426333; NCT02471469. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".