MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286311454 · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1746277

Therapieintensivierung bei Typ-2-Diabetespatienten mit basalunterstützter oraler Therapie (BOT): Hypoglykämien als Funktion des HbA1c in der SoliMix-Studie

2022· article· de· W4286311454 on OpenAlexaff
Rory J. McCrimmon, Robert Ritzel, Philip Home, Alice Cheng, Francesco Giorgino, Vivian Fonseca, Elisabeth Souhami, Agustina Alvarez, Anders Boss, Lydie Melas‐Melt, Julio Rosenstock

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetologie und Stoffwechsel · 2022
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fragestellung Therapeutische Ansätze zur Therapieintensivierung einer basalunterstützten oralen Therapie (BOT) bei Typ-2-Diabetespatienten erfordern eine Bewertung des Nutzens und der Risiken bei jeglicher gewählten Intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetologie und StoffwechselSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207