MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La honesta sustentación del clero en la Provincia Eclesiástica de Cartagena, a tenor del canon 1274 §1

2020· dissertation· es· W4286383369 on OpenAlexaff
William Alberto Narváez Meza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCartographyArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta investigación realizada con base documental y trabajo de campo que tiene por objeto generar un estudio jurídico sobre la aplicación de las previsiones del c. 1274, 1, y sus implicaciones en la dinámica administrativa y en las formas de asociación del clero diocesano, en las iglesias particulares que conforman la Provincia Eclesiástica de Cartagena; la elaboración final se realizó bajo el enfoque de análisis de la fuentes primarias -5 sacerdotes, uno por cada diócesis de la provincia- y secundarias –fuentes documentales y desarrollos normativos en la misma línea temática canónica-. El tema desarrollado en tres capítulos da cuenta de la evolución del concepto de sustentación del clero en la Iglesia universal desde las categorías planteadas en las fuentes de la Revelación hasta las orientaciones del Concilio Vaticano II y el CIC83, de manera especial en lo referido al clero diocesano. Finalmente se establecieron una serie de relaciones entre los elementos tratados por los dos primeros capítulos, todo ello a través de la contrastación de la información brindada por los informantes claves y los documentos normativos provenientes de la legislación civil y canónica en Colombia. Los hallazgos finales permiten plantear una serie de indicaciones y sugerencias para operativizar un modelo para la creación y sostenimiento del Fondo Diocesano para el sostenimiento del clero, considerando los contextos propios de cualquier iglesia particular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207